![]() is steeped in a legacy of racist ideas and policies. States define what constitutes a “needy” family for the first and second purposes and do not have to limit assistance to needy families for the third and fourth purposes.Ĭash assistance policy in the U.S. States can use federal TANF and state MOE dollars to meet any of the four purposes set out in the 1996 law: (1) assisting families in need so children can be cared for in their own homes or the homes of relatives (2) reducing the dependency of parents in need by promoting job preparation, work, and marriage (3) preventing pregnancies among unmarried persons and (4) encouraging the formation and maintenance of two-parent families. TANF’s funding structure differs greatly from AFDC, where the federal government contributed at least $1 in matching funds for every dollar that states spent. In order to receive federal funds and avoid a fiscal penalty, states must also spend some of their own dollars, known as “maintenance of effort” (MOE) spending. The programs go by different names in states, for example, CalWORKS in California. Under TANF, the federal government provides a fixed block grant to states, which use these funds to operate their own programs. Income supports help families in poverty maintain stability and promote children’s healthy development, a large and growing body of research finds. Miller, who is prosecuting this case.Īn indictment or criminal complaint are merely allegations, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.Congress created the TANF block grant through the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996, as part of a federal effort to “end welfare as we know it.” TANF replaced AFDC, which had provided income support in the form of cash assistance to families with children in poverty since 1935. Attorney Myers thanked Assistant United States Attorney Matthew B. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. A federal district court judge will determine the actual sentence after considering the U.S. If convicted on all counts, Rochelle faces up to 5 years in federal prison. The FBI, Social Security Administration, Office of Inspector General, Indiana Attorney General’s Office – Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and IMPD investigated this case. Perry did not disclose that she had been earning wages at health care facilities. In those reports, Perry declared, under penalty of perjury, that she had not earned any income since May 2019. On two separate occasions, in August 2021 and October 2022, Perry submitted Work Activity Reports to the Social Security Administration. At a third facility, she worked as a Memory Care Program Coordinator from February 26, 2020, to April 16, 2020.īetween December 3, 2019, and December 2, 2022, Perry received approximately $54,991.30 in Social Security disability benefits under her true Social Security number. She worked as an LPN at one facility from January 21, 2021, to April 27, 2021, and at a second facility from May 10, 2021, to November 23, 2021. Perry applied for these positions despite not having a nursing license. Of the five job applications, four were for LPN positions. Perry has never received any type of nursing license in the state of Indiana. ![]() In some of the job applications, Perry also used a stolen Licensed Practical Nurse (“LPN”) license number to trick the employers into believing she was an LPN. Additionally, Perry knew that she might not be able to pass an employment background check if she applied to a health care facility using her true Social Security number. ![]() She was receiving Social Security disability insurance benefits under her true Social Security number, and she knew that those benefits would be reduced or eliminated if the Social Security Administration found out she had a job. Perry used a stolen Social Security number on all five of the applications. The indictment was unsealed today, following Perry’s arrest and initial appearance.Īs alleged in the indictment, between February 26, 2020, and March 23, 2022, Perry submitted five fraudulent applications for employment to Indianapolis area nursing homes and assisted living facilities. INDIANAPOLIS- A federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging Rochelle Perry, 49, of Indianapolis, Indiana, with five counts of Social Security number fraud, three counts of aggravated identity theft, and one count of Social Security disability benefits fraud.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |